Home Team Rosters

All things RCR! And RCR related... or not even related at all- whatever needs saying.

Moderators: draggin lady, Voting Board Members

Forum rules
This is a PUBLIC area for non-members to interact with skaters and get involved with the league.

RCR's Public Forum Rules & FAQ

Home Team Rosters

Unread postby Frenchie » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:31 pm

How do you guys feel about home team roster numbers?

Should it be the 14 that is allowed in WFTDA sanctioned bouts?
Should it be the full team charter (up to 20)?
Should it be somewhere in the middle? Would that be confusing to fans?

Would more skaters on the bout rosters sell more tickets?
Would it give more new skaters more bout play time?
Would it effect our TT negatively? Positively? Not make a difference?

What do you think?
Rose City Rollers Skater and Volunteer
Email address: frenchie@rosecityrollers.com
User avatar
Frenchie
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:05 pm
Location: Heartless Heather
Team Affiliation: Wheels of Justice

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby GrumpityBugg » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:42 pm

My 2 cents? The full 20.

More skaters getting a shot to skate in any given bout, more of their supporters in the stands ... and I'm not sure how it could negatively impact the TT.

On the other hand, I am curious about what the team coaches have to say about it.
GrumpityBugg
GnR sponsor and semi-rabid track-side supporter.
Twitter: @richardmiller

\m/ \m/
User avatar
GrumpityBugg
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 10:54 am
Location: PDX
Team Affiliation: Fan

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby white flight RISK » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:47 pm

realistically, I would not want a 20 person roster. It takes some of the pressure off of the captains/coaches that have to decide come game day, which is nice. However, it sucks being that player that is "on the roster" but never steps foot on the floor. They sit there all dressed up with nowhere to go. From my own personal experience, I would have rather been helpful to the team in some other way. Keeping a roster cap keeps people working hard. Maybe moving the cap from 14 to 16 would be a nice middle ground.
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards
User avatar
white flight RISK
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Player's Club
Team Affiliation: High Rollers

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby Intensive Scare » Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:50 am

Agree with Whitey. No surprise there. 16.
President, Rose City Rollers

"Each friend represents a world in us, a world possibly not born until they arrive, and it is only by this meeting that a new world is born."

Anaïs Nin
User avatar
Intensive Scare
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 7:47 am
Location: RCR President
Team Affiliation: High Rollers

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby Slim Sheety » Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:13 am

I wouldn't mind seeing all 20 on the roster. In a lot of cases it would not necessarily be all 20 when you factor in injuries, absences and other circumstances that always seem to happen.
I agree that it would sell more tickets, personally it's the biggest selling point for me (when I'm playing).
I also agree with Whitey re: dressing down with no where to go sucks.

Something to think about. When the game is a blowout having the lesser experienced players on the roster MIGHT give them a chance to play that otherwise would not happen at a roster of 14. Thus, increasing their bouting experience.
Not that blowouts happen much in our home season, but something to consider when thinking of increasing the roster.

I like the middle ground of increasing the roster to 16-17 if nothing else.

Thanks for bringing this up Frenchie.
And be proud to be outta your mind and outta control
User avatar
Slim Sheety
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:58 am
Location: SlutFuckerVille, USA
Team Affiliation: Break Neck Betties

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby Rhea DeRange » Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:28 am

Opening it up to 20 people doesn't offer much in way of incentives for practice attendance and hard work. I personally like the competion for roster spots.
20 people would be difficult to manage from a bench manager stand point. I do think 15 or 16 would be manageable, still competetive, and give more girls a chance to play (and sell tickets).
User avatar
Rhea DeRange
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 4:57 pm
Location: Break Neck Betties, Wheels of Justice
Team Affiliation: Gorge Roller Girls

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby F-Bomb » Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:37 am

From a league perspective, it would be great if home teams were more inclusive regarding bout rosters and playing time. More skaters with bouting experience = stronger league. I also think it would be great for morale. Skaters work really hard on and off the track - the payoff everyone wants is playing time. I agree that 20 would be challenging to manage on the bench. 16 skaters sounds like a good middle ground.

The fan experience is a huge factor, so I'm hoping more derby fans share their feedback. I'm guessing it would be more exciting for family/friends of skaters to buy tickets if their friend/family member is playing in a bout. It also might be more fun for fans to actually see a more diverse group of skaters on the track.
RCR Vice President
WFTDA Compliance Panel Chair
fbomb@rosecityrollers.com
Haters can drink their haterade.
User avatar
F-Bomb
 
Posts: 2640
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:27 am
Location: Portland, OR
Team Affiliation: Heartless Heathers

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby white flight RISK » Tue Dec 28, 2010 1:31 pm

mind meld!
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards
User avatar
white flight RISK
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Player's Club
Team Affiliation: High Rollers

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby swag » Tue Dec 28, 2010 1:32 pm

16 sounds about right. I have a tiny mind and would find 20 confusing.

I see the point about bench-coaching chaos when you get up around 20.

I also understand the complaints of those who are on a team but get no track time. That's not fun for them or for their friends and family who go to see them skate.

Good luck with this decision. See you at the Coliseum in a couple of weeks.
User avatar
swag
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:40 pm
Team Affiliation: Fan

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby CynicalGuy » Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:06 pm

You may want to roster 14 for a bout, but keep 18 in the stable so to speak---injuries, the revelation that derby is not the skater's thing anymore, and life crises may eat into a roster over the course of a season, so keep some extra gals around, unless you can simply resort to getting skaters out of fresh meat training to suit up for a home team pronto.
CynicalGuy
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:17 pm
Location: New Yorker living in Seattle
Team Affiliation: Fan

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby Amanda HugNKill » Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:11 pm

Did someone say "fan feedback?!" :D

I like 16 or 18, but with the understanding that the additional 2 or 4 only be alternates in the case of a blow-out or injury. That way, a skater who is an alternate can realistically tell their friends/family "I might get to skate". If friends/family decide to come to a bout to see a specific skater who doesn't end up getting used, they'll still see some awesome derby. Also, not including the full 20 incites competition and motivation for a spot on the bout roster, and including more than the WFTDA-14 gives some of the developing skaters a shot at some minutes.
-Amanda HugNKill
(website contributor and SuperFan)
User avatar
Amanda HugNKill
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:09 pm
Location: In the crash zone or on the dance floor
Team Affiliation: Wreckers

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby white flight RISK » Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:14 pm

Cynical

Generally speaking, all teams have more than 14 players on their team rosters. However, the bouting roster sits at 14 skaters per team for any given bout except for the season opener. When people get injured, leave the team for any reason, etc. all teams have other people to fill that spot.
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards
User avatar
white flight RISK
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Player's Club
Team Affiliation: High Rollers

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby Push La Tush » Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:41 pm

I like 16, it's a little more than we have now but still pushes every member of a team to strive for excellence. 18-20 seems to easy to me, it was my desire to earn a roster spot with the Betties that caused me to start skating with travel team this last summer. Believe me when I say that it took a LOT of motivation to go to practices four nights a week that scared me so much that I literally had wobbly knees and an upset stomache pretty much every night. :shock:
User avatar
Push La Tush
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:16 pm
Location: Chillsville
Team Affiliation: Break Neck Betties

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby Domesticated Violence » Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:38 pm

"IF" we need to increase it I would say 16 is the MAXIMUM. We need to maintain competition within the team for "spots" on the roster.

One thing EVERYONE should remember is just because you are on the "playing roster" does not mean you will ever step foot on the track. I'm not sure how much it would affect ticket sales because our team doesn't announce the bouting roster until 2 days before the bout. I know other teams don't announce it until the day of. Part of the logic behind that is we want everyone to be giving 100% all the time, not just when they know they are on the roster. If you want your friends and family to see you on the track then you should be busting ass at practice in order to gain your spot.
User avatar
Domesticated Violence
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:56 am
Location: Break Neck Betties Undefeated 2007 & 2009 Champs
Team Affiliation: Break Neck Betties

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby dancingscott » Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:39 pm

Fan perspective, eh? I generally shy away from these discussions because I figure the women playing the sport have much better perspective than I can offer. What I want as a fan is whatever makes the best possible team which inspires me to scream as loud as possible and lose as much of my voice as I can. Hearing all the pros and cons about different roster numbers, it sounds to me like a max of 16 in the roster would be ideal.
User avatar
dancingscott
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:08 pm
Team Affiliation: Fan

Re: Home Team Rosters

Unread postby Dr. Snark N. Stein » Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:31 pm

I'm certainly in favor of there being a smaller difference between the size of the team charters and size of the bout rosters. :)

How many skaters travel with Axles or Wheels? It seems like it's more than the 14 who are on a roster for any particular bout, so maybe that number would be a good size for team charters? And maybe give each team a few spots for "inactive" skaters who they don't want to let off the charter but who aren't actually competing for spots on the bout roster?

Reducing the number of skaters on the team charters doesn't move skaters from Fresh Meat to teams, but on the other hand, it must suck to get drafted from Fresh Meat and "make the team" but not, y'know, the actual skating team. :/
Dr. Snark N. Stein

\m/ \m/

gnr blogger formerly known as "grant"
DrSnarkNStein@gmail.com
User avatar
Dr. Snark N. Stein
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:22 pm
Location: SE Portland
Team Affiliation: Fan


Return to General Discussion & FAQ

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron